Realistic Bigfoot timeline artwork featuring a towering Sasquatch beside a forest valley town with moody skies and paranormal documentary style atmosphere. The complete timeline of Bigfoot sightings by Strange & Twisted

Bigfoot Sightings: From The First Encounter To The Latest Reports

The Full And Complete Timeline Of Bigfoot Sightings From The Beginning to The Present Day

Something enormous has been moving through the forests of North America for thousands of years. It leaves footprints sixteen inches long. It stands eight feet tall. It smells like something that doesn't belong to this world. And it has never been caught.

Before the Name Existed: Indigenous Accounts and Ancient Encounters

Long before the word "Bigfoot" existed, long before it appeared in any newspaper, any book, any film, the Indigenous peoples of North America had been living alongside something in the forests. They named it differently depending on their nation. The Salish called it se'sxac, meaning "wild men", which is where the word Sasquatch derives. The Iroquois described a creature called the Genoskwa, an aggressive, hair-covered giant with skin like rock. The Plateau tribes spoke of "stick Indians", nocturnal beings who stole from camps and caused travellers to become lost in the wilderness. The Nootka people of the Pacific coast told of the Matlog, a fearsome creature that would carry people away into the deep forest.

These were not casual campfire stories. They were generational warnings, woven into the spiritual and practical knowledge of entire civilisations, passed down across centuries.

In 986 AD, when Leif Erikson and his Norse crew landed on the coast of North America, a place they called Vinland, they recorded encountering what they described as large, ugly, hairy manlike creatures with great black eyes and a foul smell that emitted terrifying shrieks. Erikson called them Skrælingar, a Norse word of contempt for wild men. Whether these were early Bigfoot encounters or something else entirely, nobody can say. But the description predates the modern legend by nearly a thousand years.

 

Part One: The Historical Record (1811–1957)

The Thompson Footprints

January 7, 1811

Athabasca River, near Jasper, Alberta, Canada

The first written record by a European explorer of what may have been Bigfoot tracks was set down by David Thompson, a British fur trader and explorer, on January 7, 1811. Thompson was travelling through the deep wilderness near Jasper, Alberta, when he and his party encountered a set of enormous footprints in the snow. He measured them at fourteen inches long and eight inches wide, far larger than any known animal in the region. The tracks had four toes and showed no claw marks, ruling out bears. Thompson recorded the discovery in his journals. He offered no explanation.

Jacko

July 4, 1884

Near Yale, British Columbia, Canada

One of the most intriguing and debated stories in early Bigfoot history appeared in the Daily British Colonist on July 4, 1884, under the headline: "What Is It? A Strange Creature Captured Above Yale."

According to the report, an engineer driving a train along the Fraser River between Lytton and Yale in British Columbia spotted what appeared to be a body lying across the tracks. He brought the train to a stop, and when crewmen investigated, a creature fled into the nearby rocks. The men gave chase, eventually capturing it when one dropped a heavy rock from above, rendering it unconscious.

The creature, nicknamed "Jacko" by its captors, was described as standing four feet seven inches tall and weighing 127 pounds, covered entirely in black glossy hair approximately an inch long except for the palms of its hands, the soles of its feet, and the area around its eyes. It had abnormally long arms and reportedly possessed extraordinary strength.

Jacko was said to have been transported by train to Yale and put on public exhibition at the local jail. The paper reported that 200 people came to see the creature, only to find that no such creature was on display.

Subsequent investigation by Bigfoot researchers John Green and René Dahinden concluded that the Jacko story was most likely a piece of sensational journalism rather than a factual account, noting that no follow-up reporting by rival newspapers confirmed the creature's existence, and that a second report that same month appeared to mock the original story entirely. Jacko remains one of the great unresolved footnotes of the Bigfoot legend.


Wear The Legend Buy The Strange & Twisted Bigfoot T-Shirt Here
Front view of white Bigfoot T-shirt with bold Sasquatch illustration

The Ape Canyon Attack

July 1924

Mount St. Helens, Washington State, USA

In mid-July 1924, five prospectors, including Fred Beck, Marion Smith, Roy Smith, Gabe Lefever, and John Peterson, were working a gold claim on the eastern slopes of Mount St. Helens in Washington State. For several days they had been finding enormous human-like footprints around their cabin, measured at roughly eighteen inches in length. Each morning there were more.

Then the sounds began, shrill, peculiar whistling in the evenings, carried back and forth between creatures on neighbouring ridges, along with a deep booming, thumping sound one of the men described as something beating on its chest.

One afternoon, Fred Beck spotted a large, ape-like creature standing at the edge of a canyon rim and fired at it with his rifle. The creature toppled into the gorge below. That night, the consequences arrived.

The men were woken around midnight by something pelting the roof of their cabin with rocks. The attack was sustained, deliberate, and terrifying, the creatures returning again and again, hurling boulders against the structure, ramming the walls, attempting to break through. Beck later described it as several creatures working together. The assault continued through the night and into early morning. At daybreak, the prospectors fled. They found tracks measuring up to sixteen inches outside the cabin, sunk deep into the earth. The canyon where Beck had shot the creature was subsequently named Ape Canyon, a name it retains to this day.

US forest rangers who investigated the site later claimed the footprints were fake. Beck disputed this until his death. His 1967 written account of the incident, We Killed a Bigfoot, detailed his belief that the creatures were interdimensional beings rather than purely physical animals.

The Albert Ostman Abduction

Summer 1924

Toba Inlet, British Columbia, Canada

Albert Ostman was a Swedish-Canadian lumberjack and prospector who spent decades keeping one of the strangest secrets in Bigfoot history. He finally disclosed it in 1957, swearing his account before a Justice of the Peace in Fort Langley, British Columbia.

Ostman claimed that in the summer of 1924, the same year as the Ape Canyon attack, he had been camping alone near Toba Inlet in British Columbia while searching for lost gold mines. He had noticed for several nights that something had been moving through his camp and interfering with his supplies.

On the final night, he woke to find himself being lifted, sleeping bag and all, and carried through the forest. He was unable to see his captor in the dark. After what he estimated was a three-hour journey, he was dropped onto the ground.

He had arrived at the home territory of a family of four Sasquatch: an old male, roughly eight feet tall and weighing, Ostman estimated, 700 pounds; a female approximately seven feet tall and 500 to 600 pounds; an adolescent male of around seven feet; and a young female. They were covered entirely in hair except for their palms, the soles of their feet, and the area around their eyes and upper nose. They had a language, a form of chattering communication between themselves. They appeared to be vegetarians, gathering nuts and roots. They slept under woven cedar bark blankets.

Ostman lived among them for six days, observing carefully and planning his escape. His chance came when the old male seized his snuff tin and swallowed the entire contents. As the creature became violently ill from the tobacco, Ostman gathered his gear and ran. He hiked until he found human trails and eventually reached civilisation.

He kept the experience entirely to himself for thirty-three years, fearing people would think him insane. It was only the growing media coverage of Bigfoot sightings in the 1950s that prompted him to speak. He submitted to multiple interviews with researchers including John Green, whose investigation found no internal inconsistencies in his account across multiple detailed tellings. Whether the story is believed or not, Ostman's testimony remains one of the most extraordinary claimed encounters in the history of the subject.

Learn More About Sasquatch And Bigfoot In The Twisted Guide To The Unexplained Sasquatch Edition.

The William Roe Encounter

October 1955

Mica Mountain, British Columbia, Canada

On August 26, 1957, a man named William Roe, a highway worker and experienced outdoorsman from Edmonton, Alberta, walked into a notary's office and swore a legal affidavit about something he had witnessed on Mica Mountain, British Columbia, in October 1955. His account is considered by many researchers to be the most credibly documented close-range Bigfoot encounter prior to the Patterson-Gimlin film.

Roe had been working a road crew in the area and used a day off to climb approximately five miles up Mica Mountain to an old abandoned mine. Near the summit, he came into a clearing and noticed what he initially took to be a grizzly bear feeding in the brush on the far side. He settled quietly onto a small rock to observe, rifle in hand.

The creature stood up.

It was female, roughly six feet tall, and covered from head to foot in dark brown, silver-tipped hair. Its head was higher at the back than the front. It had a flat nose, wide, flat lips, and small, brown, soft eyes. Its arms were disproportionately long, nearly reaching its knees. It walked entirely upright on two legs with a fluid, unhurried gait. It was eating the leaves from wild cherry bushes as it moved toward him, unaware of his presence.

Roe watched it for several minutes from approximately seventy-five yards away. He raised his rifle. Then he lowered it, he later wrote that the creature's face was too human. He could not bring himself to shoot.

When the creature finally caught his scent, it looked directly at him. He described the expression as neither frightened nor threatening, but contemplative. Then it turned and walked calmly into the forest. At the edge of the trees, it looked back once more before disappearing.

Roe's affidavit was sworn before it would have been profitable or particularly culturally resonant to fabricate such an account. He sought no fame. He refused to embellish. He had no explanation to offer. The physical description he set down in 1957, the crowned head, thick non-tapering torso, abnormally long arms, wide feet, would be repeated by independent witnesses for the next seven decades, many of whom had never heard of William Roe.

Fan Of Bigfoot And Sasquatch? Wear The Legend With The Strange & Twisted Sasquatch Research Team Tee
Sasquatch Research Team T-shirt with dark print of Bigfoot research logo on heather grey fabric.

Part Two: The Name Is Born (1958)

Jerry Crew and the Bluff Creek Tracks

August 27, 1958

Bluff Creek, Northern California, USA

The word "Bigfoot" was born on a logging road in the Six Rivers National Forest of Northern California. And it was born by accident.

Jerry Crew was a cat skinner, an operator of a Caterpillar bulldozer, working on a new logging access road being cleared through the wilderness of Bluff Creek. On the morning of August 27, 1958, he arrived at his worksite and found something that stopped him dead: enormous, humanoid footprints pressed into the earth around his bulldozer. Sixteen inches long. Each toe individually defined. Sunk deep into the ground with a weight that no man could account for.

This was not the first morning it had happened. For weeks, the logging crew had been arriving to find equipment moved overnight, fifty-gallon fuel drums thrown considerable distances, and more of the enormous tracks appearing around the site. The crew had been talking about it privately, half-afraid to be laughed at.

Crew made plaster casts of the footprints and took them to Andrew Genzoli, a journalist at the local Humboldt Timesnewspaper. Genzoli, who initially thought it made a good curiosity story for a Sunday edition, published the account on September 21, 1958. In describing the tracks left by whatever enormous creature was terrorising the logging crew, Genzoli used the word the loggers themselves had been using: "Big Foot."

The story exploded nationally. What had been a local mystery became a national obsession overnight. America had a name for something it had been dimly aware of for a very long time.

Years later, in 2002, it was revealed that a local man named Ray Wallace had admitted, on his deathbed, to having made some of the Bluff Creek tracks using carved wooden feet. However, the extent of Wallace's involvement has been seriously questioned by researchers, and multiple sightings, tracks, and encounters at Bluff Creek predated and postdated Wallace's alleged involvement. The controversy did not, and has not, resolved the broader question.

 

Part Three: The Most Famous Sixty Seconds in Cryptid History (1967)

The Patterson-Gimlin Film

October 20, 1967

Bluff Creek, Northern California, USA

At some point in the early afternoon of October 20, 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin were riding on horseback along the sandy bank of Bluff Creek in Northern California when their horses suddenly panicked.

Patterson looked to his left and saw why.

Standing on the opposite bank, approximately ninety to one hundred feet away, was a large, dark, bipedal figure. It was covered in dark, reddish-brown hair. It was female, large, pendulous breasts visible beneath the fur. It stood somewhere between six and seven and a half feet tall. It was moving away from them along the creek bed at a steady, powerful walk.

Patterson's horse threw him. He scrambled to his feet, grabbed his rented 16mm Kodak camera, and ran. He was unsteady, still recovering from being thrown, and the camera shook. But he got footage.

In the fifty-nine seconds of film that survive, the creature walks away from the camera with a long, heavy stride, its arms swinging considerably lower than a human's, its torso remarkably thick, its head set low between broad shoulders with a distinct sagittal crest rising from the skull. At one point, it turns and looks directly into the camera, a moment captured in what became known as Frame 352, probably the single most scrutinised still image in the history of cryptozoology.

The creature the Bigfoot community named "Patty" then continued into the trees and was gone.

Patterson and Gimlin followed her trail and cast her footprints, fourteen and a half inches long. Patterson drove to Eureka and had the film developed immediately. He called his brother-in-law the same evening to tell him what had happened.

The film has been analysed, debated, and contested for nearly sixty years. Biomechanics experts have argued the creature's gait, the flexion of its knees, the rotation of its hips, the compliance in its footfall, is inconsistent with a human in a suit and more consistent with an unknown primate. Sceptics have argued a well-made costume explains everything. Bob Heironimus, a man who knew Patterson, claimed in 1999, thirty-two years after the fact, that he was the person in the suit, though his account contained details inconsistent with the film.

Then, in March 2026, a documentary called Capturing Bigfoot premiered at the South by Southwest (SXSW) film festival. Director Marq Evans presented what he described as a newly discovered 40-second film clip from 1966, which he claimed showed a rehearsal of a thinner figure walking through a wooded area in a manner similar to the 1967 footage. Patterson's son Clint appeared in the documentary, stating his belief that his father faked the film and later burned a costume. The documentary caused significant division in the Bigfoot research community, some accepting it as definitive proof of a hoax, others challenging the provenance and chain of custody of the new footage.

As of this writing, the Patterson-Gimlin film remains officially unresolved.

 

Part Four: The Decades of Sightings (1970s–2000s)

The Sierra Sounds

1971–1975

Sierra Nevada Mountains, California

In the early 1970s, researchers Ron Morehead and Al Berry made a series of recordings in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California that became known as the Sierra Sounds, and they remain some of the strangest audio evidence in the Bigfoot case.

The recordings, made over several seasons of camping in the high Sierra, captured vocalisations unlike any known animal: complex, high-pitched calls, chattering exchanges between multiple voices, and deep rumbling sounds that linguists and audio experts who later analysed them concluded were outside the range of known human or animal vocal production. Some researchers argued the sounds showed structural patterns consistent with a primitive language. The Sierra Sounds have never been definitively explained.

The Fouke Monster

1971

Fouke, Arkansas, USA

In the spring of 1971, the Ford family of Fouke, Arkansas, reported a series of terrifying encounters with a large, hairy creature near their rural home. Bobby Ford claimed the creature grabbed at him through an open window and that family members had seen it peering into the house on multiple occasions. Tracks were found. The story was reported by local papers and quickly spread.

The Fouke Monster, as it became known, inspired the 1972 film The Legend of Boggy Creek, which dramatised the accounts and was seen by millions of people. The creature, described as approximately seven feet tall, covered in dark reddish-brown hair with glowing red eyes, continued to be reported in the Fouke area for years afterwards.

The FBI Hair Analysis

1976–1977

In 1976, the Bigfoot Information Center and Exhibition wrote to the FBI requesting that fifteen hair samples taken from an alleged Bigfoot encounter in Oregon be scientifically analysed. In a remarkable acknowledgement of the subject's seriousness, the FBI agreed. The Bureau's scientists examined the samples under microscope. Their conclusion: the hairs were of deer family origin. Not Bigfoot, but not dismissed out of hand either. The correspondence was finally released publicly in 2019 under a Freedom of Information request.

The Paul Freeman Footage

August 20, 1994

Blue Mountains, Washington State, USA

Paul Freeman was a former US Forest Service patrolman who had his first Bigfoot sighting in 1982 near Walla Walla, Washington. On August 20, 1994, he filmed a large, dark figure moving through forest in the Blue Mountains of Washington. The footage, compared favourably by some researchers to the Patterson-Gimlin film in terms of the figure's proportions and gait, remains one of the most discussed pieces of post-1967 Bigfoot video evidence. Freeman also documented numerous trackways in the Blue Mountains region, with dermal ridges preserved in his casts that Dr. Jeff Meldrum of Idaho State University later studied as anatomically consistent with a large, unknown primate.

The Marble Mountain Footage

Summer 2000

Marble Mountains, California, USA

During a youth group camping trip in the Marble Mountains of California, trip leader Jim Mills filmed a large, upright figure on a distant hillside. The figure, though caught at some distance and in limited resolution, appeared to be covered in dark hair and moved on two legs. The footage was widely circulated and became one of the more frequently discussed video sightings of the early internet era. Sceptics suggested it showed a person in a hiking suit on the ridge; proponents noted the figure's size relative to the surrounding trees appeared inconsistent with a human.

The Rick Jacobs Camera Trap Images

September 16, 2007

Allegheny National Forest, Pennsylvania, USA

In September 2007, hunter Rick Jacobs mounted a motion-activated trail camera to a tree in Pennsylvania's Allegheny National Forest, baited the location, and retrieved his camera days later. What the camera had captured caused considerable controversy.

Two images showed a creature crouching at the base of a tree, covered in dark hair, its face partially obscured, its limbs and proportions not immediately consistent with any known animal in Pennsylvania's forests. The images were submitted to the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organisation (BFRO). The Pennsylvania Game Commission subsequently identified the creature in the photos as a bear with mange, a skin condition that strips bears of their fur and can dramatically alter their appearance. Bigfoot researchers disputed this, arguing that the creature's limbs and posture in the images were inconsistent with bear anatomy.

Wear The Legend, Get Your Bigfoot Hoodie Here
Sasquatch cryptid portrait hoodie on white with bold SQUATCH text

Part Five: The Modern Era (2010s–Present)

The Provo Canyon Video

October 2012

Provo Canyon, Utah, USA

In October 2012, a group of siblings hiking in Provo Canyon, Utah, spotted what they initially took to be a bear sitting in the brush ahead of them and began filming on a phone. The figure then stood up. Unlike a bear, it rose smoothly and fully upright to what appeared to be a considerable height, and turned toward the group. The hikers ran, dropping the camera momentarily. The resulting footage, shaky, brief, and shot in the half-light of a mountain trail, was posted online and went globally viral within days. The creature's shape and the manner of its rising prompted considerable debate. No definitive explanation was established.

The Colorado Tourist Train Sighting

2023

San Juan Mountains, Colorado, USA

In 2023, passengers Shannon Parker and Stetson Tyler were aboard a tourist train travelling through the San Juan Mountains of Colorado when they filmed a large, dark figure moving along a distant ridgeline. The video, widely shared across social media platforms, showed a bipedal silhouette moving with a long stride against the treeline. It became one of the most discussed recent Bigfoot sightings, partly because of the involuntary nature of the encounter, the witnesses were tourists on a scheduled rail journey, not Bigfoot hunters. Sceptics proposed the figure was a person hiking. Researchers noted that the stride length appeared inconsistent with a human at that distance.

The Ohio Flap

March 2026

Northeast Ohio, USA

In the most recent significant cluster of Bigfoot activity as of this writing, the Midwest, and Ohio specifically, has become an unexpected hotspot.

Between March 6 and March 10, 2026, the Bigfoot Society, a podcast and online community dedicated to collecting eyewitness accounts, received six separate reports from wooded areas near Mantua and Garrettsville, southeast of Cleveland. The concentration of sightings within four days prompted researchers to describe the cluster as a possible "flap", the cryptozoological term for multiple sightings in close temporal and geographic proximity.

The most recently logged report at the time of writing came from March 15, 2026, when Thomas Paulchell, a college professor, and his wife were hiking at the Audubon Wetlands Preserve on the outskirts of Ashland, Ohio. They discovered a series of large, bipedal tracks and heard unexplained rhythmic knocking sounds from the surrounding woodland. The report was filed with the BFRO as a Class B, a classification for encounters involving physical evidence or sounds rather than a direct visual sighting. BFRO investigator Matthew Moneymaker noted that the wetlands preserve sits less than half a mile from the site of a 2021 Class A report, a direct visual sighting, and that the two areas are connected by natural wildlife corridors along the Jerome Fork River.

Ohio now ranks fourth nationally in total BFRO-logged Bigfoot reports, with 318 documented encounters.

Always Wondered What The Difference Between Sasquatch And Bigfoot Is? Find Out Here

The Numbers Behind the Legend

The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organisation (BFRO) database, maintained by an all-volunteer network of researchers and investigators, now contains over 16,000 documented reports from across North America.

Washington State leads all US states with over 708 confirmed reports, reflecting the Pacific Northwest's deep history of Bigfoot encounters. California follows with 461, Florida with 344, and Ohio with 318. Every US state except Hawaii has at least one documented report on record.

The Bigfoot phenomenon is, in raw statistical terms, the most widely reported cryptid encounter in human history.

What Science Has Said

In 2023, researcher Floe Foxon published a statistical analysis finding a strong correlation between reported Bigfoot sightings and known black bear populations across the United States and Canada, concluding that, on average, one Bigfoot report occurs for approximately every 900 black bears in a given area. Wildlife experts consistently note that bears can stand and walk short distances on their hind legs, and that poor lighting, distance, and the psychological priming of expectation can dramatically alter perception.

Primatologist Jane Goodall, one of the most respected figures in her field, has stated publicly on multiple occasions that she would not rule out the existence of a large, undiscovered primate in North America. "I'm sure they exist," she said in a 2002 interview. She has never retracted the statement.

Dr. Jeff Meldrum, Professor of Anatomy and Anthropology at Idaho State University, has spent decades studying alleged Sasquatch trackways and remains the most credentialled academic actively engaged with the evidence. His analyses of dermal ridge patterns in trackway casts, anatomical details that cannot easily be faked, have led him to conclude that the cumulative evidence warrants serious scientific investigation.

No specimen, no body, no bone, no tooth, no conclusive biological sample has ever been confirmed.

What It All Means

The Bigfoot question is not really about whether a large primate is walking the forests of North America undetected. It is about what it means that tens of thousands of people, across centuries, across continents, across every demographic and cultural background, have described the same thing.

The same height. The same hair. The same proportions. The same smell. The same silence. The same unnerving sense, reported again and again, that the creature is not simply an animal, that it is somehow aware, somehow watching, somehow deciding whether or not to let itself be seen.

From David Thompson's footprints in an Alberta snowfield in 1811, to the terrified loggers of Bluff Creek in 1958, to the hikers of Provo Canyon running from something that stood up wrong, to the professor and his wife finding tracks in an Ohio wetland in March 2026, the encounters have never stopped.

Whatever it is, it has been here a very long time.

Love Cryptids And The Mothman Legend? Get Your Mothman Cryptid T Shirt By Strange & Twisted Here
Black unisex Mothman t-shirt for cryptid fans, front view

Timeline: Bigfoot Sightings at a Glance

Date Location Witness(es) Key Detail
986 AD Vinland (North America) Leif Erikson's crew Described large, hairy, foul-smelling manlike beings
January 7, 1811 Jasper, Alberta, Canada David Thompson 14-inch humanoid footprints in snow, first written European record
June 30, 1884 Yale, British Columbia Train crew "Jacko", probable journalistic fabrication; disputed
Summer 1924 Toba Inlet, British Columbia Albert Ostman Claimed abduction by family of Sasquatch; story sworn before JP in 1957
July 1924 Ape Canyon, Washington Fred Beck and miners Night attack on cabin by multiple creatures hurling boulders
October 1955 Mica Mountain, BC William Roe Close encounter with female Sasquatch; sworn legal affidavit filed 1957
August 27, 1958 Bluff Creek, California Jerry Crew Sixteen-inch tracks found, coined the name "Bigfoot"
October 20, 1967 Bluff Creek, California Patterson & Gimlin Fifty-nine seconds of 16mm film, the most debated Bigfoot footage ever
1971–1975 Sierra Nevada, California Morehead & Berry "Sierra Sounds", unexplained vocalisations recorded over several seasons
1971 Fouke, Arkansas Ford family Creature peered into home; inspired The Legend of Boggy Creek
1976–77 Oregon (FBI analysis) FBI Lab Hair samples tested; identified as deer family
August 20, 1994 Blue Mountains, Washington Paul Freeman Video footage and trackway casts with dermal ridges
Summer 2000 Marble Mountains, California Jim Mills Large bipedal figure filmed on hillside during youth camping trip
September 16, 2007 Allegheny National Forest, PA Rick Jacobs Trail camera images of unidentified hairy creature; disputed
October 2012 Provo Canyon, Utah Siblings hiking Creature filmed rising from brush and standing fully upright
2023 San Juan Mountains, Colorado Shannon Parker & Stetson Tyler Bipedal figure filmed from tourist train
March 6–10, 2026 Mantua/Garrettsville, Ohio Multiple witnesses Six separate reports in four days, described as a "flap"
March 15, 2026 Ashland, Ohio Thomas Paulchell Large bipedal tracks and unexplained knocking sounds at wetlands preserve


Read The Full Story Of Bigfoot By Strange & Twisted Here

Strange & Twisted is an independent dark lore apparel brand building one of the internet's largest paranormal encyclopaedias. New stories every week. Explore more at strangeandtwisted.com

Hunt legends in comfort. Explore the Strange & Twisted Cryptid Collection, featuring Bigfoot, Mothman, Wendigo, Fresno Nightcrawlers, Jersey Devil, and more, built into original apparel designed for people who live for the unexplained.

 

 

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.